Facelift After Threads: Myths vs Truths

Date 22 September 2025

Facelift After Threads: Myths vs Truths

A Scientific Fact Sheet for Aesthetic and Surgical Professionals


Myth 1: Thread lifts make future facelift surgery dangerous or impossible.

Truth: When performed correctly, thread lifts do not interfere with future facelifts. Threads placed in the subcutaneous plane avoid surgical dissection zones. Absorbable threads (e.g., PDO, P(LA/CL)) dissolve in 6–18 months and do not distort anatomy. Surgeons confirm that facelift after threads is safe when protocols are followed. 1, 2, 3


Myth 2: Threads cause fibrosis that interferes with surgical dissection.

Truth: Threads induce a controlled foreign-body reaction. This neocollagenesis improves dermal support and enhances overall tissue quality. Compared to scarring from prior facelifts, thread-induced fibrosis is superficial and predictable. (1, 4, 5, 6,7)


Myth 3: If a patient had threads, facelift results will be compromised.

Truth: Facelift results depend on tissue condition and surgical skill, not thread history. Properly placed threads may enhance skin firmness. (1, 8, 9)


Myth 4: Plastic surgeons should avoid thread-lifted patients.

Truth: Avoidance is unnecessary. Disclosure of prior aesthetic treatments and a comprehensive clinical assessment enable safe surgery. Experienced surgeons routinely operate on patients with prior threads, fillers, or RF. (1, 10, 11)


Myth 5: Dermatologists and aesthetic doctors ruin faces for surgeons.

Truth: Today’s patients have complex treatment history. In the era of aesthetic medicine there is no “virgin” skin. Surgeons must collaborate with aesthetic physicians to achieve the best outcomes. Interdisciplinary respect and communication lead to safer, more effective results. (1, 11, 12)


For more insights, check our videos:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InQML8EgXn4


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWBazrmqnsc


https://youtu.be/RQGqbjeNVeA


https://youtu.be/a3F7X3g92WU


References:

1.     Kolkhida & AMWC Panels, 2025,

2.     Kim, J., Kim, H. S., Seo, J. M., Nam, K. A., & Chung, K. Y. (2016). Evaluation of a novel thread‐lift for the improvement of nasolabial folds and cheek laxity. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology31(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13887

3.     Sarigul Guduk, S., & Karaca, N. (2018). Safety and complications of absorbable threads made of poly‐L‐lactic acid and poly lactide/glycolide: Experience with 148 consecutive patients. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 17(6), 1189–1193. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12519

4.     Abada, D., El Maadawy, I., Hodeib, A., & El Ghamry, S. (2020). Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Thread Lift in Mid Face. The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery44(1), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejprs.2020.88937

5.     Haddad, S., Galadari, H., Patil, A., Goldust, M., Al Salam, S., & Guida, S. (2022). Evaluation of the biostimulatory effects and the level of neocollagenesis of dermal fillers: a review. International Journal of Dermatology61(10), 1284–1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.16229

6.     Burko, P., & Miltiadis, I. (2025). Evolution of Thread Lifting: Advancing Toward Bioactive Polymers and Sustained Hyaluronic Acid Delivery. Cosmetics12(3), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics12030127

7.     Song, J. K., Chang, J., Cho, K. W., & Choi, C. Y. (2021). Favorable Crisscrossing Pattern With Polydioxanone: Barbed Thread Lifting in Constructing Fibrous Architecture. Aesthetic Surgery Journal41(7), NP875–NP886. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjab153

8.     Mortada, H., Alkilani, N., Halawani, I. R., Zaid, W. A., Alkahtani, R. S., Saqr, H., & Neel, O. F. (2024). Evolution of Superficial Muscular Aponeurotic System Facelift Techniques: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Complications and Outcomes. JPRAS Open39, 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2023.06.003

9.     Hong, G., Kim, S., Park, S. Y., Wan, J., & Yi, K. (2024). SMAS repositioning technique utilizing cog thread: Anatomical perspectives. Skin Research and Technology30(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.13650

10. Nizamoglu, M., Nugent, N., & Pacifico, M. (2025). Enhancing safety, patient experience and outcomes in an independent UK ambulatory aesthetic surgical clinic. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery107, 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2025.06.018

11. Skouras G, Skouras A, Skoura E. How Minimally Invasive Treatments Can Render a Subsequent Face Lift More Difficult. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Jul 1;152(1):76-84. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010149. Epub 2023 Jan 3. PMID: 36728578.

12. Jałowska, M., Kowalczyk, M., Gornowicz‑Porowska, J., & Adamski, Z. (2019). The interdisciplinary aspects of aesthetic medicine. Journal of Face Aesthetics2(2), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.20883/jofa.12

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our site. Cookies are used to collect information about how visitors use our site. We collect the information to compile reports and to help us improve the site. The cookies collect information in an anonymous form, including the number of visitors to the site, where visitors have come to the site from and the pages they visited. Details.